Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Peter Navarro published a lengthy report Thursday outlining several examples of voting irregularities that are “more than sufficient” to swing the outcome of the election in President Trump’s favor.
The 36-page report “assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states” and concludes that “patterns of election irregularities ... are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election, strategically game the election process in such a way as to ... unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket.”
The I M M A C U L A T E D E C E P T I O N:
Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities
The Navarro Report
This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations,1 testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.
The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.
From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the observed patterns of election irregularities are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election outright, strategically game the election process in such a way as to “stuff the ballot box” and unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket. Topline findings of this report include:
The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities.
The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.
All six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election irregularities. However, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.
This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.
In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth. This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and the stability of our political system and Republic.
Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election. If this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people.
The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches.
The Report included here: https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf
On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations.
As I said during my Senate confirmation hearing and since, I am committed to ensuring the greatest possible degree of transparency concerning the Special Counsel’s investigation, consistent with the law.
At 11:00 this morning, I will transmit copies of a public version of the Special Counsel’s report to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. The Department of Justice will also make the report available to the American public by posting it on the Department’s website after it has been delivered to Congress.
I would like to offer a few comments today on the report.
But before I do that, I want to thank Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for joining me here today and for his assistance and counsel throughout this process. Rod has served the Department of Justice for many years with dedication and distinction, and it has been a great privilege and pleasure to work with him since my confirmation. He had well-deserved plans to step back from public service that I interrupted by asking him to help in my transition. Rod has been an invaluable partner, and I am grateful that he was willing to help me and has been able to see the Special Counsel’s investigation to its conclusion. Thank you, Rod.
I would also like to thank Special Counsel Mueller for his service and the thoroughness of his investigation, particularly his work exposing the nature of Russia’s attempts to interfere in our electoral process.
As you know, one of the primary purposes of the Special Counsel’s investigation was to determine whether members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, or any individuals associated with that campaign, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. Volume I of the Special Counsel’s report describes the results of that investigation. As you will see, the Special Counsel’s report states that his “investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election. As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election. But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter. That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.
The Special Counsel’s report outlines two main efforts by the Russian government to influence the 2016 election:
First, the report details efforts by the Internet Research Agency, a Russian company with close ties to the Russian government, to sow social discord among American voters through disinformation and social media operations. Following a thorough investigation of this disinformation campaign, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian nationals and entities for their respective roles in this scheme. Those charges remain pending, and the individual defendants remain at large.
But the Special Counsel found no evidence that any Americans – including anyone associated with the Trump campaign – conspired or coordinated with the Russian government or the IRA in carrying out this illegal scheme. Indeed, as the report states, “[t]he investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.” Put another way, the Special Counsel found no “collusion” by any Americans in the IRA’s illegal activity.
Second, the report details efforts by Russian military officials associated with the GRU to hack into computers and steal documents and emails from individuals affiliated with the Democratic Party and the presidential campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton for the purpose of eventually publicizing those emails. Obtaining such unauthorized access into computers is a federal crime. Following a thorough investigation of these hacking operations, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian military officers for their respective roles in these illegal hacking activities. Those charges are still pending and the defendants remain at large.
But again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations. In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.
The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet. The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication. Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps. The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts. Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy. Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.
Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign. After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.
So that is the bottom line. After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.
After finding no underlying collusion with Russia, the Special Counsel’s report goes on to consider whether certain actions of the President could amount to obstruction of the Special Counsel’s investigation. As I addressed in my March 24th letter, the Special Counsel did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment regarding this allegation. Instead, the report recounts ten episodes involving the President and discusses potential legal theories for connecting these actions to elements of an obstruction offense.
After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Although the Deputy Attorney General and I disagreed with some of the Special Counsel’s legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law, we did not rely solely on that in making our decision. Instead, we accepted the Special Counsel’s legal framework for purposes of our analysis and evaluated the evidence as presented by the Special Counsel in reaching our conclusion.
In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation. As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability. Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.
Now, before I take questions, I want to address a few aspects of the process for producing the public report that I am releasing today. As I said several times, the report contains limited redactions relating to four categories of information. To ensure as much transparency as possible, these redactions have been clearly labelled and color-coded so that readers can tell which redactions correspond to which categories.
As you will see, most of the redactions were compelled by the need to prevent harm to ongoing matters and to comply with court orders prohibiting the public disclosure of information bearing upon ongoing investigations and criminal cases, such as the IRA case and the Roger Stone case.
These redactions were applied by Department of Justice attorneys working closely together with attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, as well as with the intelligence community, and prosecutors who are handling ongoing cases. The redactions are their work product.
Consistent with long-standing Executive Branch practice, the decision whether to assert Executive privilege over any portion of the report rested with the President of the United States. Because the White House voluntarily cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, significant portions of the report contain material over which the President could have asserted privilege. And he would have been well within his rights to do so. Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice. Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report. Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege.
In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released. That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication. The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions.
In addition to making the redacted report public, we are also committed to working with Congress to accommodate their legitimate oversight interests with respect to the Special Counsel’s investigation. We have been consulting with Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler throughout this process, and we will continue to do so.
Given the limited nature of the redactions, I believe that the publicly released report will allow every American to understand the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation. Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate congressional requests, we will make available to a bipartisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information. Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves – with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared.
I believe that this accommodation, together with my upcoming testimony before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, will satisfy any need Congress has for information regarding the Special Counsel’s investigation.
Once again, I would like to thank you all for being here today. I now have a few minutes for questions.
“High-ranking FBI insiders are pulling back the curtain on Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned and spread the bogus Trump dossier.” ~truepundent
It appears the embattled intelligence firm was quite busy paying off Big Media reporters, according to federal sources who have traced dozens of transactions between TD Bank and media members as well as media organizations, sources confirm.
This story will help many undecided confused or more liberal minded to understand that the Main Stream Media (MSM) or any of the three to four letter acronyms that claim to be free and open press may not be as open or free as we thought. They appear to be as President Trump has stated many times FAKE NEWS!!! Want to know more? Look at Project Mockingbird.
If you want true knowledge of what is going on in the geopolitical world, to know the story behind the story, start following Q. Its better than any daytime TV. You can use the link below to read more or just say Alexa “enable Q Anon Q Research
Remember Q post can be added to your morning news brief on Alexa enabled devices follow this link or just say “alexa enable qanon qresearch”
Q Post 2668
Jan 11 2019 03:19:34 (EST)
Q post 2669
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 9b77a9 No.4707199
Jan 11 2019 03:27:18 (EST)
Awaiting VIP arrival.
What senior US official is arriving in China?
Q Post 2670
Jan 11 2019 03:36:09 (EST)
At what point is it mathematically impossible?
The very next day.
Public access to intel?
Q Post 2671
Jan 11 2019 05:15:03 (EST)
If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?
What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal?
Why is the Senate important?
Who controls the Senate?
Enjoy the show.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6d1065 No.4617497
Jan 5 2019 20:06:58 (EST)
Why do D’s always PUSH (force R’s to include Spending Bills for approval) BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR FOREIGN AID?
Who audits where the money ‘actually’ goes?
How do politicians become ‘extremely’ wealthy while in office on gov’t salaries?
How do xyz ‘orgs’ etc. remain funded? https://www.foreignassistance.gov https://www.foreignassistance.gov/explore
Why do D’s only care about CONTROL/POWER?
POWER OF THE PURSE.
POWER = PROTECTION.
THE WHEEL OF CORRUPTION.
Welcome to the CON.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8f2403 No.4617772
Jan 5 2019 20:20:07 (EST)
That’s right President Trump retweeted Twitter handle Trump Train asking when will the trials for treason begin!!!
Interestingly no one in the media will touch this subject or ask anything about the possible treasonous acts by many in the former Obama administration. The Executive order shown below will play a big part in the upcoming months this EO became effective yesterday January 1 2019. Click the image to be taken to the document on whitehouse.gov.
The image below is taken from the 8chan board where an anon posted the highlights of the changes that will take effect, and they are all related to treason and what constitutes treason or espionage.
Clicking the image below will take you to the full document with annex 1 included I have included some of the parts related to the anon post above sighting the espionage and treason sections
2. Article 103a (10 U.S.C. 903a)
. Text of statute.
(a)(1) Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent or reason to believe that it
is to be used to the injury of the
United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation,
communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to
any entity described in paragraph (2), either directly or indirectly, anything described in
paragraph (3) shal
l be punished as a court
martial may direct, except that if the accused is
found guilty of an offense that directly concerns (A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft
or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against la
scale attack, (B) war plans, (C) communications intelligence or cryptographic information,
or (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy, the accused
shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court
(2) An entity referred to in paragraph (1) is
(A) a foreign government;
(B) a faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign
country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States; or
(C) a representative, offi
cer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen of
such a government, faction, party, or force.
(3) A thing referred to in paragraph (1) is a document, writing, code book,
signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, not
instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense.
(b)(1) No person may be sentenced by court
martial to suffer death for an offense
under this section (article) unless
(A) the members of the court
martial unanimously find at l
east one of
the aggravating factors set out in subsection (c); and
(B) the members unanimously determine that any extenuating or
mitigating circumstances are substantially outweighed by any aggravating circumstances,
including the aggravating factors se
t out in subsection (c).
(2) Findings under this subsection may be based on
(A) evidence introduced on the issue of guilt or innocence;
(B) evidence introduced during the sentencing proceeding; or
(C) all such evidence.
(3) The accused shall
be given broad latitude to present matters in
extenuation and mitigation.
(c) A sentence of death may be adjudged by a court
martial for an offense under
this section (article) only if the members unanimously find, beyond a reasonable doubt, one
or more o
f the following aggravating factors:
(1) The accused has been convicted of another offense involving espionage or
treason for which either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by
(2) In the commission of the offense, the
accused knowingly created a grave
risk of substantial damage to the national security.
(3) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave
risk of death to another person.
(4) Any other factor that may be prescribed by the Pres
ident by regulations
under section 836 of this title (article 36).
(a) That the accused communicated, delivered, or transmitted any document, writing, code
book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic nega
tive, blueprint, plan, map, model, note,
instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense;
(b) That this matter was communicated, delivered, or transmitted to any foreign
government, or to any faction or party or military o
r naval force within a foreign country,
whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent,
employee, subject or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly; and
(c) That the accused did so with
intent or reason to believe that such matter would be used
to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation.
(a) That the accused did a certain overt act;
(b) That the act was done with the intent to commit the offense of espionage;
(c) That the act amounted to more than mere preparation; and
(d) That the act apparently tended to bring about the offense of espionage.
Espionage as a capital offense
(a) That the accused committed espionage or attempted espionage; and
(b) That the offense directly concerned (1) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or
satellites, early warning systems, or other mea
ns of defense or retaliation against large scale
attack, (2) war plans, (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (4) any
other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy.
Intent or r
eason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the
United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation
means that the accused acted in bad faith
and without lawful authority with respect to information that is not lawfully accessib
le to the
National defense information
. “Instrument, appliance, or information relating to the
national defense” includes the full range of modern technology and matter that may be developed
in the future, including chemical or biological
agents, computer technology, and other matter
related to the national defense.
Espionage as a capital offense
. Capital punishment is authorized if the government alleges
and proves that the offense directly concerned (1) nuclear weaponry, military
satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale
attack, (2) war plans, (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (4) any
For those interested in alexa skills development this is the text submitted to alexa for reading:
Russian bots, created by the firm new knowledge? New knowledge warned Americans in November to remain vigilant in the face of Russian efforts to meddle in U.S. elections. Now, New knowledge has been exposed for creating Russian bots and useing them in the elections, specifically in the Roy Moore Alabama Senate race, depicting him as a Russia preferred candidate, new knowledge created fake Russian bots with Russian names, and Facebook pages, to plant the idea that the Moore campaign was boosted by a Russian bot, net, on social networks. Reid Hoffman, the co-founder and executive chairman of LinkedIn, contributed 750 thousand dollars to American, engagement, technologies, which spent about 100 thousand dollars on the new, knowledge, experiment. Next in Q news, Q post 1794, pointing us to FIYSA GATE reads FIYSA, FIySA, FIySa, 20, in brackets, Public Disclosure. impossible to defend. ILLEGAL, RE M,S,M. Never interfere With an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself. Q. and Q post 2539, The Public is about to learn that the D O J, F B I,+ other U S / Foreign assets have been actively working behind the scenes in one of the largest criminal investigation in modern day history. De-Class > Purpose > Illuminate the ‘TRUTH’ > People, transparency is the only way forward [CONTROLLED MEDIA – ‘ENEMY of the PEOPLE’ ] . Q. Whats happening in 20 19? we know that executive order titled 20 18 amendments to the manual for courts – martial, United States goes into effect January 1st. 20 19. An anon on 8 chan put up a post highlighting the changes for Death Penalty. this post including sections that highlight espionage or treason for which a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by statute. This post can be found on blog titled q news for January 1 2019 on a high jacked life dot com. Events coming in the beginning of 2019?. 1st, Michael Cohen congressional public hearing, 2nd, Team Mueller release of political report on Russian collusion. The Third event, is the release of the o i g Horowitz report on possible FIySA abuse, which can only be released after Muller’s investigation is over. Clarifying further as to when the first alarm bell will ring… Q post 26 26. The Clock is ticking. When will the first alarm bell ring? If the senate was the primary target (majority control)… 53 to 47 active when? EO (designated targets) active when? Ongoing investigations…. There are a lot of sealed indictments, Special counsel. It’s all going to come out. Uranium one, Steele Dossier, Clinton foundation, Sean Hannity. I have pretty good sources… Sean Hanity. There is a reason why Sean Hannity, Sarah Carter, and John Solomon, are on stage. Q.
Todays Q update showing how the fake news media is being exposed by the past
Q post 2640
HUSSEIN ISIS JV TEAM
Did ISIS form on HUSSEINs watch
Did HUSSEIN take care of business or allow them to expand
How long did it take POTUS to ERADICATE and DESTROY ISIS
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THE TRUTH
Why did HUSSEIN attempt to destroy our military (weaken)?
What was the 16-year plan to destroy America?
Why did HUSSEIN install traitors at the highest levels of our Gov’t?
Think NAT SEC.
Why did HUSSEIN bring people into the WH who HATE AMERICA and what we stand for?
What years did HRC serve as Sec of State?
What years did ISIS expand?
Why did HUSSEIN put restrictions on US MIL COMMAND re: ABILITY TO ATTACK TARGETS AT WILL > WH DIRECT APPROVAL REQ FOR EACH ACTION?
FACTS NOT FICTION.
BLIND SHEEP FOLLOW.
EYES ON TARGET.
Q linking us to H R C tweet about Syrian withdraw, and Obama’s military officer purge in 5 years time.
Hello anons of Q anon on 8 chan, proudly serving at the pleasure of the POTUS. I have an update!! The QAnon News Brief should be approved sometime today and available to add to your device via the flash brief section of alexa
This site will soon be providing a “News Flash” with Q Anon post updates and notable post review. The new RSS feed has been submitted for review and is titled Q Anon Q research look for it in the skills section of news and add it to your morning news brief! I’m working out the details of the rss feed to include audio and video for those using a new app on devices with screen. Please provide any feedback here on the blog post comments section. Things are moving faster and faster in the Q world and this service should make the Q information available to a new audience as currently there are no news sources on this service for the Q information dis im in nation program. Have a great day and look for updates here any questions leave at bottom of this post. Feed for a hi jacked life can be found at http://ahijackedlife.com/feed Or http://ahijackedlife.com/atom Thanks all, Will
Hello anons of Q anon on 8 chan, proudly serving at the pleasure of the POTUS. This site will soon be providing a “News Flash” with Q Anon post updates and notable post review.
The new RSS feed has been submitted for review and is titled Q Anon Q research look for it in the skills section of news and add it to your morning news brief!
I’m working out the details of the rss feed to include audio and video for those using a new app on devices with screen.
Please provide any feedback here on the blog post comments section.
Things are moving faster and faster in the Q world and this service should make the Q information available to a new audience as currently there are no news sources on this service for the Q information disimintation program.
Have a great day and look for updates here any questions leave at bottom of this post.
Feed for ahijackedlife can be found at http://ahijackedlife.com/feed